Posted on October 9, 2013 by email@example.com
” Just like the seeds in the soil, the initial non- cancerous cells grow and multiply in the absence of the right conditions. And ‘ here that the power becomes important. ”
How much can affect our diet in a disease such as cancer ?
How much responsibility did what we eat in its rapid development ?
How can a change of power in the care or, indeed, in the regression of this terrible disease ?
As always, the statements of dr. Campbell are quite determined about it.
After 40 years of research dedicated to the fight against cancer at the highest levels in the U.S. scientist rightly called a ” among the 25 most influential people in the field of nutrition ” claims to have seen enough to break the veils of a science , he says, ” is not always synonymous with honest search for the truth as many believe .”
“I have 79 years , I have had a long and rewarding career and I did not write this book to make money . I have no financial interest that you believe me . I do not sell health supplements , seminars or coaching about . [...] I want to tell you this story because I owe it to you all . “From” WHOLE ” .
I personally met the dr. Campbell and I can not fully embrace the opinion of many who , in a loud voice , defend and support the intellectual honesty of man Campbell even before the researcher’s known all over the world.
Deciding to write The China Study at the end of a long brilliant career was certainly not an easy choice. Publicly defend positions widely attacked ( and attached ) from a world of science that can be very unforgiving with those who rebel , is certainly not been easy .
Yet ( and I add , thankfully) Campbell did. He lifted the veil of a life spent in science and science opening the door to new research .
For this reason, sometimes, when I find myself having to answer questions , criticisms, and considerations about the books , his medical arguments and so-called scientific evidence in support of his thesis , I see the tired look used a year ago in Vicenza in reply to my own doubts and my many questions.
“I opened the door . Now it’s up to you to go forward. ”
And ‘ This is the message that I, personally , groom in full.
And ‘ to us , willy-nilly, have to go forward. And we believe that it is or at least what to strength , defying interests far greater than he , dr. Campbell argued with his research and written very clearly in his later books.
And ‘ to us that it is the task of continuing with the research there where he stopped or throw everything in the trash as ” dated ” or worse, “incomplete” . And ‘ to us that the task of pointing the finger where there might be bulleted or defend a status quo that is certainly not exempt from the same defects in those who would like to change it.
In short, it is up to us to decide whether to remain in a critical position or look over .
Change is not easy. But certainly not impossible.
friendfeed gplus linkedin delicious digg facebook myspace technorati tumblr twitter pinterest rss email print bookmark
This entry was posted in Financial family . Bookmark the permalink .
← CAMPBELL ON RAI Radio 1 , Saturday, October 5th 2013STUDIANDO HISTORY … →
2 Responses to ” OFF ” THE CANCER AND REALLY ‘ POSSIBLE?
October 15, 2013 at 12:03
Nicla dear , are susy penco and university researcher . about
to your email on the china study , I was puzzled seeing that the
graph refers to the animal model , the rat .
we are upset , I do not believe in the extrapolation of data from animals to humans . cm ² is a text to be disseminated .
nicla nicla says:
October 16, 2013 at 11:23
Hello Susy . Yes, the graphic in the video refers to the animal model , and specifically to the rat . After all of these graphs is that in The China Study Campbell starts talking about his personal history and research of the first connections detected in the laboratory between protein consumption and cancer. As you well know , in the chapters to follow , his studio expands from the animal world to the epidemiological and laboratory man in much larger project and documented precisely called The Chiana Study. The choice of one piece of video on my part is no longer a need for immediacy of message of completeness ( as obvious) : in a nutshell, in this video, Campbell summarizes his message which of course is then read and thorough . Thanks for your comment that gave me a chance to explain. See you soon